WSB Radio in Atlanta has the best traffic reports every
morning and afternoon during what often seems to be endless rush hours. If you
know anything at all about Atlanta traffic, you know that Capt. Herb and his
crew on WSB can be a huge help.
The preacher from one of Atlanta’s larger churches often
buys thirty second spots on WSB Radio, and sometimes on television stations.
(His last name, by the way, isn’t Stanley.) He actually says some pretty good
things – often focusing on marriage, parenting, and living a meaningful life.
But every time I hear one of those spots I instantly think “he sounds a little
smug,” and then I wonder how non-believers respond to them.
I’m not saying this particular preacher is smug. I met him
once and he was very personable and cordial. What I am wondering, though, is
whether or not you can really talk about the moral and social implications of
the Christian gospel to an audience that isn’t exclusively Christian without sounding
a bit smug. While the gospel and its implications for life make so much sense
to us, can we discover a way to talk about it without sounding a bit smug to
people for whom they don’t make much sense?
Tim Keller, in his book Center
Church, says “A missional church, if it is to reach people in a
post-Christian culture, must recognize that most of our more recently
formulated and popular gospel presentations will fall on deaf ears because
hearers will be viscerally offended or simply unable to understand the basic
concepts of God, sin, and redemption.” (page 272) In other words, we come off
sounding rather smug!
Keller goes on to say, “This fact does not, however, require
a change in the classic Christian doctrines, but rather skillfulness in
contextualizing them so our gospel presentations are compelling even to people
who are not (yet) fully persuaded by them.” (page 272) Clearly the issue isn’t
that we have to make the challenge of the gospel go away – but to discover a
way to talk about the challenge so that others will listen to us.
There has to be some tension between the content of the
gospel itself and our discovery of the most appropriate way to talk about the
gospel. And perhaps we could use a reminder that the gospel is, first and
foremost, about Jesus. Most of us would probably agree that among the most
troubled spots Paul every planted a church was Corinth. Their theological and
sociological problems are legendary. Yet Paul can say “we preach Christ and Him
crucified.” (1 Corinthians 1:18-25)
It seems odd to me to listen to the helpful tone of Capt.
Herb tell me an alternative route followed by the smug Christian voice telling
me what is right for my life. Getting your marriage right or your role as a
parent right seems a little more complicated that a traffic jam and it will
take a little more than the nearest alternative route. But the gospel so often comes across in such
smug, you-know-I-am-right tones that unless I really am committed to following
Him, the mere smugness of it all closes my ears.
The smugness factor often makes us appear more anti-culture
than cross-cultural. The more cross-cultural we are, the more likely we are to
transform the world we live in. The more anti-cultural we are, the less likely
others will even hear what we’re saying, much less allow it to transform them.
Of course our greatest testimony to the world about the uniqueness of the
Christian gospel is not a radio ad we pay for, but our willingness to serve
others – “labors of love” as Paul describes it in 1 Thessalonians 1 – as we
bring God’s grace to bear on the daily reality of living in this world.
No comments:
Post a Comment