In my neck of the woods, we have just endured (suffered
might be a better word) the primary season for the upcoming November elections.
Unfortunately, Georgia law requires a 50% plus 1 vote count in order to win, so
we are now in a similar world of run-off elections to see who will be the
nominee for various offices – from county commissioners to state legislators to
the governor to US Senate candidates.
In a state where the civic Jesus is still pretty popular, candidates
often approach elections by seeing if they can “out Christian” their opponents.
Seemingly every issue before every government has an official “Christian
option” and the politicians are determined to identify that option with their
campaigns. When more than one candidate sees the same “Christian option,” then
the effort to “out Christian” each other takes on Mach level speed.
All of that has had me thinking about the use of adjectives.
In particular, it makes me wonder about the need to attach the adjective
“Christian” to my points of view, my position on issues, and especially on my
life. If I truly am a “Christian candidate,” wouldn’t you know that without the
adjective “Christian” on every campaign poster? Even more complicated for me is
the fact that all sorts of positions get labeled “the Christian option” when
I’m pretty confident Christians might view that issue differently. One of the
mailers in my box recently declared “Christians stand for the Second
Amendment.” Really?
In a remarkable little sentence in 1 Thessalonians 4, just
before he launches into a protracted (for 1 Thessalonians) discussion of the
reappearing of Jesus, Paul is talking about our daily lifestyles and notes that
how we live is important so that “your daily life may win the respect of
outsiders and so that you will not be dependent on anybody.” (1 Thessalonians
4:11, 12, NIV) That is prefaced by
his admonition that we should “live a quiet life, mind our own business, and
work with our hands.”
The word Paul uses that is reflected in “win the respect of
outsiders” is from a family of words, not used very often in the New Testament,
that suggests “decent, proper, becomingly, appropriate, and presentability.”
I’ve tried, but failed, to find a way to think that Paul really isn’t
suggesting that how I daily live my life is how I win the respect of outsiders,
that is, unbelievers. But it seems pretty obvious that this is precisely what
he is saying. When all is said and done, my most important avenue for
influencing non-believers is what they see me do in my daily living.
You don’t have to do a lot of research to know that at this
particular juncture in Western culture, believers aren’t at the top of the list
of things people respect. The civic Jesus roars with a bit of arrogance that
this simply demonstrates how far our culture has drifted from its moorings. But
the Jesus of Scripture would remind us “how often I have longed to gather your
children together, as a hen gathers her chicks under her wings.” (Matthew
23:37, NIV)
If you think about it, when the choice is a “lecture on what
is wrong with you” or “an invitation to come and find protection,” that really
isn’t a hard decision to make. It boils down to the nature of the gospel itself
– is it “fix your lives and come to Jesus” or “come to Jesus and let’s fix our
lives together.”
I’m confident that the answer is the latter of those two
options and equally confident that is why Paul wants us to live our daily lives
in a way that “wins the respect of outsiders.” It shouldn’t require an
adjective before my name and life to make that happen.
No comments:
Post a Comment