I will never forget the Sunday morning I made the near fatal
mistake of placing my Bible on the floor next to my chair on the stage from
which I would soon preach. It was almost time for the Lord’s Supper and there
was no place to put my Bible, so I casually placed it on the floor. I had no
intention to be disrespectful of Scripture, but apparently I gave that
impression. Someone came to me and whispered in my ear, “We don’t put the Bible
on the floor here.”
Admittedly I was in a foreign land and knew little of the
cultural expectations associated with owning a Bible. I quickly picked it up
and all was forgiven. I’m guessing half the audience was thinking, “those
arrogant Americans, don’t they know the Bible shouldn’t be put on the floor!”
We can get pretty possessive about the Bible!
A part of the hoopla over the Noah movie right now reflects that sense of ownership. “These are
our stories and no Hollywood screen writer can fool with it.” While I get that some of that sentiment is
born of our respect for Scripture, the truth remains that these stories belong
to God and His church, not any of us as individuals. And if the standard is
something like “unless you interpret it exactly right, don’t touch it,” that
puts the Bible out of reach for me – and I’m guessing most folks.
One of my favorite theologians is Stanley Hauerwas. In his
book, Unleashing the Scriptures, he
notes that because “North American Christians” tend to read Scripture as
democrats who get to vote on what it says, it “should be taken away from North
American Christians.” I often make the chapter where he says that required
reading in my class on interpreting the Scripture. As you can imagine, there is
quite a bit of antagonism generated about that comment! Ultimately Hauerwas
argues that the Bible belongs to the church, not any individual believer. But
Hauerwas would argue that our overly individualistic spirit in Western culture
makes us ill fit to interpret Scripture.
Most days I would disagree with Hauerwas – we shouldn’t take
Scripture away from believers. I’ve spent a good portion of my life encouraging
others to be more disciplined readers of Scripture. Some days, I must admit, I
wonder if he might not be on to something! The Bible and its interpretation is
a community event more than an individual exercise in the democratic process.
Am I to think that no community of faith in the two thousand years of church
history has understood something about Scripture that can help me? Or for that
matter, should I think that no one among the followers of Jesus I know best could
contribute to my understanding of what God intended His Word to teach me?
But the more evangelical world of faith around me is filled
with “What this means to me . . .” as though God intended the words of
Scripture to be a personal message to whoever “me” is. My interpretation
classes generally aren’t all that thrilled when I insist that the first
question is not “what does this mean to me?” but “what did the author intend
the original readers of the text to understand as its meaning?” In other words,
the Bible wasn’t written to “us,” but, when properly understood, it can speak
powerfully to us by way of its original readers.
Could that be why Paul includes among his lists of spiritual
gifts such skills as pastors, teachers, prophets, and the like? This is not to
suggest that the Bible doesn’t speak to us – but it is to suggest that there is
a reason God put that grey matter between our ears – and we ought to use it!
Had you asked me while I was growing up what the Noah story
was all about, I might have said something like “God likes zoos.” I think I
remember a word or two about God’s saving Noah and his family, but mostly I
remember the animals. My observation about this story is that is still
primarily what gets taught in Bible studies, Sunday School classes, and other
such opportunities. Especially is that true when the audience is children.
I haven’t seen the Noah
movie yet – but will in a few weeks. But based on the reviews I’ve seen and
read I am going to hazard a guess and suggest it probably isn’t all that
faithful to the very brief and limited narrative about Noah in Genesis. Just a
wild guess. But what I was taught as a kid growing up in church wasn’t exactly
faithful to the story either. In either case, I don’t have the right story. Is
one case worse than the other?
What my Sunday School class did accomplish was interest in
the Noah story, and in the context of God’s community of faithful followers, I’ve
come to know a lot more about Noah than I did as a kid. And, quite frankly, had
to “unlearn” some of what I was taught. Thank God I didn’t get stuck in the
individualism of thinking “I already know that story.”
So the current movie can do at least one positive thing for
believers – it has started a cultural conversation that gives us opportunities
to join. I have never seen a movie about a biblical story that gets it right.
Even the wildly popular among believers Passion
of the Christ takes some pretty serious liberty with the story as told by
Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John. No offense to Charlton Heston, so did The Ten Commandments. But those movies,
like Noah, gave believers – the community
of faith – an opportunity for a conversation that we might not have had without
them.
I can’t remember the last time someone asked me a question about
Noah – that is, until about a week ago. But now it seems that the word Noah is part of lots of conversations.
I’m not a movie critic, so after I’ve seen it, I won’t have
much to say about the dialog, visual effects, and the like. But I’m thinking I
would love to have conversations about the real story and what Scripture –
Scripture that belongs to the church, not me – has to say about the story and
its meaning.
2 comments:
Very well said. Couldn't agree more about the opportunity to dialogue.
Enjoyed this, Wye...
Post a Comment