The sign out front says “Old time
religion taught here daily.” Past experience with that same church sign reminds
me that for them “old time” is somewhere around AD 1611 because that same sign
once said, “KJV Only Read Here.” But then when I observe students in their
academy outside playing soft ball – I think “old time” must mean mid-to-late
1800s, because one would think that “Little House on the Prairie” was being
filmed on their playground because the students are dressed in ways that remind
me the Engels’ kids!
That’s the problem with “old
time” – it depends upon whose definition of “old time” one adopts. For the
folks with the church sign – “old time” seems to refer to what is perceived to
be a much simpler age where we perceive it would have been easier to be a
Christian because women’s skirts were ankle length and men’s shirts were
long-sleeved.
That’s a pretty easy target – but
certainly not the only opportunity for reflection on our life and witness as
Christians. For some people I know, “old time” is purely and simply mid-1960s
worship styles and for others it’s The
Book of Common Prayer. Others would cite third and fourth century church
fathers. As I passed by a packed church building one Saturday morning, my guess
was that for them, “old time” is rooted in Leviticus.
That’s the problem with imposing
“time lines” on a timeless God and the Christian gospel which is to be
proclaimed until “the ends of the ages” and “unto the ends of the earth.” Even
for those of us who wish somehow to “restore the ancient order of things” –
there is still the great question of what that “ancient order” must look like
some twenty centuries later. For a Facebook page I occasionally look at that is
populated with “independent Christian Church ministers,” “old time” appears to
be that moment in the past when the Restoration Movement actually “restored the
church.”
It is the temptation to regulate
the Christian gospel in ways that make us feel comfortable that often gets us
into the dangerous territory of distorting the gospel. In part, that seems to
be the reasoning behind the writing of Colossians. “If with Christ you died to
the elemental spirits of the universe, why do you live as if you still belonged
to the world? Why do you submit to regulations, ‘Do not handle, Do not taste,
Do not touch?’ All these regulations refer to things that perish with use; they
are simply human commands and teachings. These have indeed an appearance of
wisdom in promoting self-imposed piety, humility, and severe treatment of the
body, but they are of no value in checking self-indulgence.” (Colossians
2:20-23, NRSV)
Whatever my “old time”
preferences might be, the moment I allow them to become normative approach to
life for others I stand in conflict with this text! Learning how to appreciate
our preferences without making them prescriptive for other believers may be
among the hardest things we Christians are called to do. But we at least ought
to try.
No comments:
Post a Comment