Pages

25 July 2018

That Pesky Discipline of Reading Scripture

I'm still reading the minor prophets. I don't know where we got that word from, but their message is anything but "minor." Zechariah - next to last in the set up of these marvelous oracles - pulls no punches. As a person who truly believes that "the Bible is the trustworthy word of God" I simply can't ignore these words. 
 
 
8 And the word of the LORD came to Zechariah, saying,
9 "Thus says the LORD of hosts, Render true judgments, show kindness and mercy to one another,
10 do not oppress the widow, the fatherless, the sojourner, or the poor, and let none of you devise evil against another in your heart." Zechariah 7:8-10, ESV

These are words the prophet Zechariah spoke to religious and political power brokers during the time the exiles are returning to Jerusalem during the reign of Darius - around 520 - 516 BC. They summon ideas/imperatives found in Deuteronomy.

They are followed by words which report Israel's disobedience to these imperatives: "11 But they refused to pay attention and turned a stubborn shoulder and stopped their ears that they might not hear. 12 They made their hearts diamond-hard lest they should hear the law and the words that the LORD of hosts had sent by his Spirit through the former prophets."

The phrase "they made their hearts diamond-hard" is one that jumps off the pages of this ancient prophet in convicting ways for followers of Jesus in our current world.

Those convicting words are then followed by words that make it clear how God feels about this:"Therefore great anger came from the LORD of hosts.13 "As I called, and they would not hear, so they called, and I would not hear," says the LORD of hosts, 14 "and I scattered them with a whirlwind among all the nations that they had not known. Thus the land they left was desolate, so that no one went to and fro, and the pleasant land was made desolate."

When we confuse religious and political power with the heart and character of God, we can expect to ignore God's call when He calls out to us and for Him to not hear our call when we finally decide to call out to Him.

As John Walton and Brent Sandy say in The Lost World of Scripture, "The legal sayings in the Pentateuch [see reference to Deuteronomy above] revealed the character of Yahweh, and the character of Yahweh has not changed. Believers still have the obligation to reflect that character as they seek to be holy as God is holy. Jesus, as God in the flesh, embodied the character of God, and so the revelation through legal sayings is fulfilled in him, and through him we see how we are to respond to those legal sayings. The authority of the legal sayings is found in the revelation they offer of the character of God and the way they serve as guides to holiness.s" (page 221)
 
For a number of years, when I teach Biblical Interpretation (and other related classes), I insist that one of the first questions we should ask of any text is "What does this text teach me about the character of God?" When I faithfully ask that question - as apparently Zechariah did - I discover that God is concerned about "the widow, the fatherless, the sojourner, the poor." If, as we often say, God's character is unchanging (Hebrews 13:8 as an often quoted text), then can a religious/political power broker who is unconcerned about what God is concerned about actually be the kind of person followers of Jesus should support? 

If I apply these ideas to my decision about voting in November, I will need to either stay home or do a lot of "write-in" voting.

16 July 2018

Where’s Amos When We Need Him?


My personal Bible reading right now has me reading the minor prophets. The last few days have been spent in Amos. Though he lived and prophesied around 760 B.C., some of his words sound as though they could be said to us in the second decade of the twenty-first century A.D.
Amos is concerned about the gap between “the haves” and “the have nots.” 

Therefore because you trample on the poor
and you exact taxes of grain from him,
you have built houses of hewn stone,
but you shall not dwell in them;
you have planted pleasant vineyards,
but you shall not drink their wine.
Amos 5:11, ESV

In case we don’t get how seriously God looks upon such behavior, Amos comes to our rescue again.

For three transgressions of Israel
and for four, I will not revoke the punishment,
because they sell the righteous for silver,
and the needy for a pair of sandals –
those who trample the head of the poor int the dust of the earth
and turn aside the way of the afflicted.
2:6, 7 ESV

In language that would be risky to use in our culture right now – and didn’t go over too well in his (see 7:10-17), Amos reminds women that their lust for luxury is not of God.

Hear this word, you cows of Bashan,
who are on the mountain of Samaria,
who oppress the poor, who crust the needy,
who say to your husbands, ‘Bring, that we may drink!”
4:1, ESV

The real issue – found embedded in the message the prophet Amos preached is idolatry. Yahweh has been replaced with gods made in their own image and when that happens, justice becomes wormwood and righteousness is cast down upon the earth. (5:7)

All of this should have brought about repentance for Israel. But listen again to Amos.

Behold, I am setting a plumb line
in the midst of my people Israel;
I will never again pass by them;
the high places of Isaac will be made desolate,
and the sanctuaries of Israel shall be laid waste,
and I will rise against the house of Jeroboam with the sword.

What especially convicts me when I read Amos is that the words weren’t said to some pagan nation of infidels that surrounded Israel and Judah. They were said to “the people of God” and it seems to have been so easy for them to get focused on possessions and luxury while ignoring the needs of their own people around them. “Silver” and “sandals” seem to be the way “the less fortunate” are viewed by “the very fortunate.”

We should all be grateful that before Amos is finished, he reminds us that God deeply desires a people to call His own.

In that day I will raise up
the booth of David that is fallen
and repair its breaches,
and raise up its ruins
and rebuild it as in the days of old,
that they may possess the remnant of Edom
and all the nations who are called by my name,
declares the Lord who does this.
Amos 9:11, 12  ESV

James, the half-brother of Jesus, and the apostles seem to think this prophecy was fulfilled when Gentiles were welcomed into the Kingdom of God. (Acts 15:12-21) As John Stott says about this quote from Amos in Acts, “In other words, through the Davidic Christ Gentiles will be included in his new community.” (The Spirit, The Church, and the World, page 247)

There is part of me that rejoices when I read Amos. God welcomes “outsiders” to become “insiders” in His kingdom. Isn’t that what Ephesians 2 is all about?

But there is a side of me that is convicted by Amos. It is so easy to assume our national and religious status automatically makes us pleasing to God. That was, it seems to me, what was in Israel’s head when Amos dared to speak on behalf of God.

N.T. Wright insists that idolatry is humankind’s core sin. (See, for example, The Day the Revolution Began.) Idolatry can take all kinds of forms – and it isn’t that it always shows up in “evil things” – we can allow “good things” to push God aside. Nationalism and religion are a dangerous mix!

24 June 2018

The Stranger that Is Among You


“The Stranger that is among you.”

Matthew 25:35, 36 – Grace – Sunday 24 June 2018


For I was hungry and you gave me food. I was thirsty and you gave me drink. I was a stranger and you welcomed me. I was naked and you clothed me. I was sick and you visited me. I was in prison and you came to me. (35, 36 ESV) . . . Truly I say to you, as you did it to one of the least of these my brothers, you did it to me.” (40)

In the ESV, the heading on this portion of Matthew’s gospel is titled “The Final Judgment.” It is the most direct and clear warning Jesus gives about who will spend eternity in His presence and who won’t. None of the issues that our age has allowed to define who is Christian and who isn’t are found in the text. Theological purity, the role of women in the church, sexuality, abortion, marriage, etc. are not mentioned. That doesn’t mean those issues don’t deserve attention – just that they can’t be allowed to define us. 

On the final night of His life, in a room where He has just washed twelve sets of dirty feet – including those of the one who would betray Him, Jesus says, “A new commandment I give to you, that you love one another; just as I have loved you, you also are to love one another. BY this all people will know that you are my disciples, if you have love for one another.” (John 13:34, 35 ESV)

On more than one occasion we are reminded that the entire Law and Prophets can be summarized and fulfilled in two fundamental behaviors: love God, and love neighbor. In what may be among the most powerful of the parables Jesus tells – we know our “neighbor” is the whole world. (Luke 10)

In the story Jesus tells that might be the most convicting of the convicting stories, the rich man – whose name we aren’t even told – spends eternity separated from God because he routinely ignored the poor, sore covered, dog-licked, crumb eating, emaciated beggar – whose name we do know – Lazarus at his front gate every day. (Luke 7)

Sojourners

The Bible is a narrative in which we bump into hundreds of “strangers at the gates” of our lives in a variety of contexts. I guess you would have to say it all started with Adam and Eve – who sojourn into a world infected with sin and death. After their son Cain kills his brother, he becomes a wanderer of sorts. The same might be said for Noah and his family – and after the Tower of Babel, being “strangers” seems to be the only option.

What if God had decided to ignore humankind since we were so “different” from Him?
But He didn’t ignore us. He called Abram and Sarai and sent them on the journey of a life time. Read their story, it starts in Genesis 12. By the time we know them as Abraham and Sarah and the parents of Isaac – they have crossed more international boundaries than I can count and have had to interact with all sorts of governing officials – not all of whom were particularly good people.

Later Jacob and his sons will go to Egypt – interestingly enough because of a famine in their land to seek food in Egypt. While that story plays itself out across generations, a man named Moses will kill both an Egyptian and a Hebrew, and out of fear for his life, flee to the land of Midian. In what may be among the most ironic of ironic twists of plots, Moses will go back to Egypt and lead the descendants of Jacob across boundary after boundary – headed to a new, safer, more peaceful “land of milk and honey.” 

The truth is, if you read the Hebrew Bible with some degree of care – you no doubt walk away with the impression that the God we love and worship has always been “an Exodus-kind of God.” He is constantly seen moving people around on the one hand; but insisting that His people care for the sojourner on the other.

When Moses is reviewing the Law just prior to his death, he addresses this issue from God’s perspective head on: “He (God) executes justice for the fatherless and the widow, and loves the sojourner, giving him food and clothing. Love the sojourner, therefore, for you were sojourners in the land of Egypt.” (Deut. 10:18, 19  ESV)

What interests me, in some ways, about these words, is that they were said to Israel in a time in the history of God’s relationship with humankind that the idea of separation was pretty important. But, the moral code of the law combined with an ethic focused on loving God and loving neighbor simply makes it impossible for even Israel, the chosen of God, not to care about the sojourners. Their story includes the fact that they too were once sojourners! 

In Leviticus, the most “law of the law” kinds of book, we are told, “When a stranger sojourns with you in your land, you shall not do him wrong. You shall treat the stranger who sojourns with you as the native among you, and you shall love him as yourself, for you were strangers in the land of Egypt. I am the Lord your God.”  (19:33-35  ESV)

It shouldn’t go unnoticed that James, in the epistle that bears his name, says, “Religion that is pure and undefiled before God, the Father, is this: to visit orphans and widows in their affliction, and to keep oneself unstained from the world.”  (James 1:27  ESV) Apparently the gospel walks beyond, not away from, what the Law demanded of Israel.
It appears to me that it is a dangerous thing to use “the Law” as an excuse for why we are giving up on the character of God. 

Jesus and Sojourners

As the Law encouraged Israel to remember – Jesus likely remembered that He too once was a sojourner. His parents took Him to Egypt – a foreign nation, an unclean nation for that matter to Jews, because of the genocide like behavior of Herod the Great. When they finally come back, they end up living in Nazareth – not exactly the quality city of the world of the first century – but safer from the political turmoil of the day
.
Has it ever dawned on us that the very people who were so drawn to Jesus were people whose lives were lived in the authentic risk of danger, daily. The well-to-do, politically connected, religiously powerful people crucified Him. The poor people, the outcasts, the oppressed, the hungry, - they found in Jesus a kind of motivation to live in the presence of God’s protection in ways they could not have imagined – were it not for the very character of Jesus.

Of course – the simple truth is – often overlooked – is that as a human, Jesus came here an alien. “He emptied Himself of equality with God to take on the form of a bondservant because he was made in human likeness.” (Phil. 2:5-11) That old hymn I grew up singing at church – “out of the ivory palaces, into a world of woe, only his great, eternal love, made my savior go.” 

What if our redeemer God refused to be a sojourner among us? What if His attitude toward people different than him was what so many in our current religious culture seems to be?

But . . . “it’s the Law”

If Paul isn’t spinning in his grave, it’s only because we really don’t stay in our graves if we belong to Jesus. The abuse of his comments about government in Romans 13 is simply stunning. But, more than a few self-perceived Christian spokesmen are saying of the issues at the border with children right now – “but it’s the law of the land, it has to be enforced.”

Well. That’s nice. The “law of the land” in the world in which the author of Romans 13 lived insisted that “only Caesar is Lord.” Do you really think Paul obeyed that Law?

In our land, abortion is “legal.” But Christians tend to insist on breaking that Law. Same-sex marriage is now legal, but some of the same people defending the border incident with “it’s the law of the land” are celebrating that the Supreme Court ruled that a bakery can insist they don’t recognize that Law.

Honestly – if “the law of the land” is the issue – then we should make plans not to celebrate the Fourth of July and instead go to London to celebrate the Queen’s birthday.

I know this is complex and I know it isn’t as simple as one side saying “build the wall and close the border” and the other side saying “let one and all in – ask no questions.”

But what I know with even more conviction is that when I became a follower of Jesus, I gave him my full allegiance. Period. I’m not saying I have always lived up to that – but I am saying that’s the standard. 

As a group of believers, we have sent several thousands of dollars to help refugees in Syria and the Middle East. I love that we have done that. We have spent several thousands of dollars helping a pregnant teen and her family; and lots of dollars on places like One Roof, Bridging the Gap, and other similar ministries.

Sojourners are all around us. We can’t let politics get in the way of reflecting that when all is said and done, our allegiance is to Jesus, the pioneer of our faith. He came to rescue sojourners like us – and calls us to follow His lead.

Some of you know that I am a huge fan of Dietrich Bonhoeffer. Over the last twenty or so years, I have read multiple biographies of his life and lots of his writings. His little book Life Together is one that I read a couple of times every year, give as gifts to people, and make a required reading in one of my classes at Point. 

I tell you that to say this. In the world of Nazi Germany leading up the WWII, the church in Germany stilled its tongue in the name of “the economy is better” or “Germany is great again.” In response to the oppressive accords at the Versailles Conference, it is easy to understand how people might have closed their eyes to other abuses in the name of getting beyond abuses imposed on them.

But, the sad story of history is that “the official church” kept quiet when it should have been a prophetic voice for justice, decency, and the idea that all humans – in their case, even Jews – were made in the image of God.

In 2004, I had the high privilege to have coffee in mid-afternoon with Professor Otto Betz and his wife in their home in Tuebingen, Germany. Professor Betz was about the same age as Bonhoeffer, but kept quiet, perhaps because otherwise he would lose his job in the university.

With big tears running down his cheeks, he said, “We knew what they were doing (the Nazis) – but wouldn’t speak up because of fear.”  I can’t remember a more moving moment in terms of realizing the cost of being a follower of Jesus.

I don’t want to say that we are on the verge of Nazism taking over our culture. But I do want to say the church can ill afford the luxury of cowering in fear because “the economy is better” or “we want to make America great again.” 

God has called us to a prophetic voice, not a political one. May we have the courage to use it.