Pages

07 August 2018

Study More. Preach Less.


Study More.  Preach Less.

Written in 1962 by Helmut Thielicke,  A Little Exercise for Young Theologians, remains required reading in Christian colleges and seminaries around the globe. Earlier this morning I ew-read for what may be the hundredth time! It is one of my “before-the-semester-begins disciplines. One of my favorite lines – and one students I have read the book seem to hate the most – is “For the reasons I have mentioned I do not tolerate sermons by first semester young theological students swaddled in their gowns. One ought to be able to keep still.” (page 12) 

Thielicke is writing over fifty years ago and the world has changed and he is writing in the context of German Christian practice. I get that and I’m not particularly interested in telling anyone that he or she can’t share their faith. But I am interested in that phrase “one out to be able to keep still.”

Fast forward to April of this year and you might have seen the issue of Christianity Today that focused on the life and ministry of Billy Graham. If you haven’t seen it, it is worth finding. One of the articles in this issue is titled “What I Would Have Done Differently.” It basically is a collection of quotations from Graham where he expressed regrets.

One of those “regrets” is about preaching. John Stott, in his wonderful book on preaching, Between Two Worlds actually has this same quote in it in a chapter titled “A Call to Study.”  Here Graham’s “regret” about preaching.

                                One of my great regrets is that I have not studied enough. I wish
                                I had studied more and preached less. People have pressured me
                                into speaking to groups when I should have been studying and
                                preparing. Donald Barnhouse said that if he knew the Lord was coming
                                in three years, he would spend two of them studying and one 
                                preaching.  I’m trying to make it up.

That was originally published in an interview Graham did with Christianity Today in 1997.
If you think about it, that really isn’t all that different from Thielicke’s sentiment in  A Little Exercise for Young Theologians.

Unfortunately we live in an age where politics is not the only area of life where polarization happens. In the world of biblical studies and ministries, it is easy to find the polar opposites of those comfortable to spend a life time studying with little engagement with the community of humans around them; and those who spend all their time engaged with the community of humans around them with little or no real study of Scripture.

If I’m hearing Graham correctly, it really isn’t “either/or” but “both/and.” But it is so easy to overreact to the one who can’t tell me about Jesus because all he or she is interested in is how the synoptic gospels came into being in the first place. Yet, what in the world would make me think I can pick up a piece of Scripture written 2000 years ago, in a language that isn’t my native tongue, to a culture that has little similarity to my own, and written by people who would recognize hardly anything about living in the 21st century and really understand its message?

If you’ve read Stanley Hauerwas’ Unleashing Scripture you might be thinking that I, like Hauerwas, think that the Bible should be taken away from North American Christians because we aren’t smart enough to read it and think that it’s all about democracy and we get to vote on what we like and don’t like. 

But you would be wrong!

What I do think though is that there is a desperate need right now for well-educated kingdom leaders who have figured out how to be biblical and relevant at the same time. After all, you can be so biblical that no one will listen to you and you can be so relevant that you really have nothing to say. In both extremes, the same thing happens – God’s truth is not heard. 

A local politician recently posted a clip from Fox News talking head Tucker Carlson. The point of the video was “college is too expensive” and “education outcomes” aren’t what they should be. The politician’s conclusion was that government ought to invest less in education. I don’t watch Carlson for a variety of reasons, including his pompous, self-inflated view of himself, and the extraordinary joy he seems to get in being condescending to others he deems less intelligent than himself. But from what I’ve seen of him, he is pretty good at manipulating facts to “prove” his talking points. I would also bet my last dime that he goes to a well-educated doctor, sends his kids (if he has any) to schools with well-educated teachers, and chooses to fly on airplanes whose pilots are well prepared for flying a modern jet airliner.

Here’s my point: in general, we don’t just stumble upon the kind of truth that can transform our lives. If the church decides that education is too expensive and education outcomes aren’t what we expected and gives up on “educating students for Christ-centered service and leadership around the world” as our mission at Point states – we can only expect fewer and fewer transformed lives. 

Almost any of us who have been believers for a while can scan through a paragraph in the Bible and declare “this is what it means to me.” The problem is, it wasn’t written to you! That’s not to say it doesn’t speak into your life – just that the way to get there isn’t by casually saying “this is what it means to me.” It means what God, the ultimate author meant it to mean to those whose ears were the first to hear it. From that vantage point – what a text meant – we can safely arrive at what a text means. We need good biblical scholars to help us here. 

I love Matthew’s editorial comment at the end of the Sermon on the Mount. That is where he says, “the crowds were stunned by His teaching, because He taught as one who knew what He was talking about, not like the poorly prepared teachers of that day.” (Huxford paraphrase, but I hope accurate!)
It’s one thing for a preacher/teacher to tell you what someone else knows about a subject – but a completely different think if he or she can tell you what they know. It seems to me that the world in general and the church in particular is in deep need of preachers, teachers, leaders “who know what they are talking about” because they have spent time with Scripture in a way that gives authority to their words.

That doesn’t mean only the educated elite can read Scripture. It does mean however our more devotional reading of Scripture can be greatly enhanced in an environment where resources are available – including well educated leaders – to help make sense of what we are reading!

To come full circle, I come back to Billy Graham’s “I would study more and preach less” comment. Surely if he – perhaps the greatest preacher of the twentieth century – felt the need to study more, most of us ought to get in line behind him for a seat in the library.

In that spirit, here are a few suggestions:


  • ·         Good Bible study resources are more available today than ever, take advantage of them.

  • ·         Good Bible study does take time – find a way to block out some space in life to converse with God through His Word.

  • ·         Read the Bible devotionally, the more I get the big story firmly fixed in my brain, the more sense the smaller parts of the story will make.

  • ·         Not everyone is called to be “pastors and teachers” to use Ephesians 4 language, so the point of this isn’t that you must be a Bible scholar to talk about the meaning of the Bible.

  • ·         It can be helpful, however, to have a trusted person in your life with whom you can talk about the Bible and its meaning. Some parts of the Bible are more complicated than others and that means we could all use a trusted resource to help us navigate through these ancient and challenging but life-transforming words.

  • ·         Read things other than the Bible. People like Scot McKnight, John Walton, Ben Witheringnton, Larry Hurtado, N.T. Wright and others are writing some outstanding, accessible to non-academic types, stuff.

  • ·         Read the Bible expecting it to be counter-cultural and counter-intuitive. I promise you the Bible will shake your world if read properly and it won’t sound a whole lot like modern Western culture. If your reading of the Bible makes some cultural or political approach to life sound perfect, there is a good chance you need to do some re-reading.

  • ·         Some of our reading of the Bible – especially the devotional kind – ought to be outside where the testimony of creation and the testimony of the Word can join hands in helping the words of our mouths and the meditations of our hearts be acceptable to God. (Ps. 19)


If you’re still reading – all I can say is “Thanks!” This has gone on longer than I intended, but frankly, I’m just tired of such “baby food” being dished out in sermons, lessons, devotions, articles, and whatever when there is such a desperate need for some “meat and potatoes.” (Hebrews 5:11-14)

The only way to discover “meat and potatoes” is to  have the courage “to keep still a bit.”

25 July 2018

That Pesky Discipline of Reading Scripture

I'm still reading the minor prophets. I don't know where we got that word from, but their message is anything but "minor." Zechariah - next to last in the set up of these marvelous oracles - pulls no punches. As a person who truly believes that "the Bible is the trustworthy word of God" I simply can't ignore these words. 
 
 
8 And the word of the LORD came to Zechariah, saying,
9 "Thus says the LORD of hosts, Render true judgments, show kindness and mercy to one another,
10 do not oppress the widow, the fatherless, the sojourner, or the poor, and let none of you devise evil against another in your heart." Zechariah 7:8-10, ESV

These are words the prophet Zechariah spoke to religious and political power brokers during the time the exiles are returning to Jerusalem during the reign of Darius - around 520 - 516 BC. They summon ideas/imperatives found in Deuteronomy.

They are followed by words which report Israel's disobedience to these imperatives: "11 But they refused to pay attention and turned a stubborn shoulder and stopped their ears that they might not hear. 12 They made their hearts diamond-hard lest they should hear the law and the words that the LORD of hosts had sent by his Spirit through the former prophets."

The phrase "they made their hearts diamond-hard" is one that jumps off the pages of this ancient prophet in convicting ways for followers of Jesus in our current world.

Those convicting words are then followed by words that make it clear how God feels about this:"Therefore great anger came from the LORD of hosts.13 "As I called, and they would not hear, so they called, and I would not hear," says the LORD of hosts, 14 "and I scattered them with a whirlwind among all the nations that they had not known. Thus the land they left was desolate, so that no one went to and fro, and the pleasant land was made desolate."

When we confuse religious and political power with the heart and character of God, we can expect to ignore God's call when He calls out to us and for Him to not hear our call when we finally decide to call out to Him.

As John Walton and Brent Sandy say in The Lost World of Scripture, "The legal sayings in the Pentateuch [see reference to Deuteronomy above] revealed the character of Yahweh, and the character of Yahweh has not changed. Believers still have the obligation to reflect that character as they seek to be holy as God is holy. Jesus, as God in the flesh, embodied the character of God, and so the revelation through legal sayings is fulfilled in him, and through him we see how we are to respond to those legal sayings. The authority of the legal sayings is found in the revelation they offer of the character of God and the way they serve as guides to holiness.s" (page 221)
 
For a number of years, when I teach Biblical Interpretation (and other related classes), I insist that one of the first questions we should ask of any text is "What does this text teach me about the character of God?" When I faithfully ask that question - as apparently Zechariah did - I discover that God is concerned about "the widow, the fatherless, the sojourner, the poor." If, as we often say, God's character is unchanging (Hebrews 13:8 as an often quoted text), then can a religious/political power broker who is unconcerned about what God is concerned about actually be the kind of person followers of Jesus should support? 

If I apply these ideas to my decision about voting in November, I will need to either stay home or do a lot of "write-in" voting.

16 July 2018

Where’s Amos When We Need Him?


My personal Bible reading right now has me reading the minor prophets. The last few days have been spent in Amos. Though he lived and prophesied around 760 B.C., some of his words sound as though they could be said to us in the second decade of the twenty-first century A.D.
Amos is concerned about the gap between “the haves” and “the have nots.” 

Therefore because you trample on the poor
and you exact taxes of grain from him,
you have built houses of hewn stone,
but you shall not dwell in them;
you have planted pleasant vineyards,
but you shall not drink their wine.
Amos 5:11, ESV

In case we don’t get how seriously God looks upon such behavior, Amos comes to our rescue again.

For three transgressions of Israel
and for four, I will not revoke the punishment,
because they sell the righteous for silver,
and the needy for a pair of sandals –
those who trample the head of the poor int the dust of the earth
and turn aside the way of the afflicted.
2:6, 7 ESV

In language that would be risky to use in our culture right now – and didn’t go over too well in his (see 7:10-17), Amos reminds women that their lust for luxury is not of God.

Hear this word, you cows of Bashan,
who are on the mountain of Samaria,
who oppress the poor, who crust the needy,
who say to your husbands, ‘Bring, that we may drink!”
4:1, ESV

The real issue – found embedded in the message the prophet Amos preached is idolatry. Yahweh has been replaced with gods made in their own image and when that happens, justice becomes wormwood and righteousness is cast down upon the earth. (5:7)

All of this should have brought about repentance for Israel. But listen again to Amos.

Behold, I am setting a plumb line
in the midst of my people Israel;
I will never again pass by them;
the high places of Isaac will be made desolate,
and the sanctuaries of Israel shall be laid waste,
and I will rise against the house of Jeroboam with the sword.

What especially convicts me when I read Amos is that the words weren’t said to some pagan nation of infidels that surrounded Israel and Judah. They were said to “the people of God” and it seems to have been so easy for them to get focused on possessions and luxury while ignoring the needs of their own people around them. “Silver” and “sandals” seem to be the way “the less fortunate” are viewed by “the very fortunate.”

We should all be grateful that before Amos is finished, he reminds us that God deeply desires a people to call His own.

In that day I will raise up
the booth of David that is fallen
and repair its breaches,
and raise up its ruins
and rebuild it as in the days of old,
that they may possess the remnant of Edom
and all the nations who are called by my name,
declares the Lord who does this.
Amos 9:11, 12  ESV

James, the half-brother of Jesus, and the apostles seem to think this prophecy was fulfilled when Gentiles were welcomed into the Kingdom of God. (Acts 15:12-21) As John Stott says about this quote from Amos in Acts, “In other words, through the Davidic Christ Gentiles will be included in his new community.” (The Spirit, The Church, and the World, page 247)

There is part of me that rejoices when I read Amos. God welcomes “outsiders” to become “insiders” in His kingdom. Isn’t that what Ephesians 2 is all about?

But there is a side of me that is convicted by Amos. It is so easy to assume our national and religious status automatically makes us pleasing to God. That was, it seems to me, what was in Israel’s head when Amos dared to speak on behalf of God.

N.T. Wright insists that idolatry is humankind’s core sin. (See, for example, The Day the Revolution Began.) Idolatry can take all kinds of forms – and it isn’t that it always shows up in “evil things” – we can allow “good things” to push God aside. Nationalism and religion are a dangerous mix!