During the 1930-31 academic year, Dietrich Bonhoeffer was
studying at Union Theological Seminary as a Sloan Fellow. While he wasn’t
impressed with the state of American theology at the time, that isn’t to say it
wasn’t a profitable year. Life in dormitories probably impacted how the
underground seminary at Finkenwalde was developed. Hearing African-American
preaching in Harlem convinced him all was not lost in American religion. Negro
spirituals had a huge impact on him – and ultimately students at Finkenwalde
for whom he would play recordings when he returned to Germany.
His friendship with a French student studying at Union also
had profound impact. Jean Lasserre gained Bonhoeffer’s respect, though there
were areas in which they disagreed. Among the areas where Lasserre challenged
Bonhoeffer was in his understanding of the nature of the church. From Lasserre’s
view, the real question was “Do we believe in the Holy Catholic Church, the
Communion of Saints, or do we believe in the eternal mission of France?”
Lasserre would say to Bonhoeffer, “One can’t be a Christian and a nationalists
at the same time.” (See Metaxas, page 111, Roark, page 16, 17)
From Bonhoeffer’s worldview, this question would cause him
to think about whether or not the church in Germany was about Germany or the
gospel. His subsequent engagement and leadership in the Confessing Church, the
seminary at Finklewalde, his role in the ecumenical movement insisting that the
“German Church” was not really church, and a host of other issues make it clear
that Bonhoeffer came to distinguish “church” from “nation.”
While our current worldview is far less dangerous than was
Bonhoeffer’s, I think his life and ministry might provide a place to stop, take
a deep breath, and have a conversation about this very topic. Is our faith
rooted in the body of Christ, called to renew and restore the universe to its
God-intended purposes, or is it in the American political system working
exactly like we believe it should?
This is probably too simplistic an explanation, but it seems
reasonable to me to observe that as Hitler and his goons began to restore
German pride, nationalism, and economy – the German Church became more and more
willing to wink at his atrocious actions. To put that in the language of
Lasserre’s question, the German Church had more faith in the eternal mission of
Germany than it did in the gospel of Jesus Christ. It went to bed with dogs and
woke up infested with fleas.
Bonhoeffer would use the rest of his far too short life
fighting against such perversion of the Christian gospel. Despite another
opportunity to go back to Union and teach, his conscious wouldn’t let him stay
in New York, and in less than two months – in July 1939 – he set sail for home
because, as he wrote in a letter to his friend Reinhold Niebuhr, “I shall have
no right to participate in the reconstruction of Christian life in Germany
after the war if I do not share the trials of this time with my people.” When
you read about Bonhoeffer’s life there is no question that his faith was that
the church, following the gospel of Jesus Christ, would be the hope for Germany’s
reconstruction.
Despite the horrific moments that surrounded him, Bonhoeffer
never pulls the old “hell in a hand basket” routine. In Ethics, he says, “The night is not yet over, but already the dawn
is breaking.” (page 17) Later in that
same section, he says “Only the form of Jesus Christ confronts the world and
defeats it. And it is from this form alone that there comes the formation of a
new world, a world which is reconciled with God.”
Smarter people than I will have to make the legal judgments
about President Obama’s executive order about immigration. When MSNBC sounds
like the Messiah has come and Fox News makes you think of Paul’s man of
lawlessness, you can be pretty sure it is probably a little more complicated
than either side would have you think!
Here’s what I am smart enough to understand. First, I never
discount the privilege of where I was born, politically speaking. To be a
citizen of the United States has made my desire to follow Jesus much easier –
and quite frankly likely – than had I been born in Iraq, for example. So I’m
not some weird leftist who doesn’t get the blessing of the place of my birth. I
ought to be thankful for that more often than Thanksgiving week by the way.
Second, my ancestors arrived in Charleston, South Carolina
(and other east coast cities) before there was a United States, so I’m not all
that fond of having a monarch instead of an elected leader. I am equally
interested in having elected officials who understand that the nature of
government like the one we have can never succeed when one side or both sides
of an issue operate on a “my way or the high way” approach to governance. If
the goal is to point fingers of blame at those who have created this
immigration nightmare, we don’t have enough fingers!
Third, no matter how this current hullabaloo gets resolved,
the nature of the transforming power of the Christian gospel will not be
diminished – unless we continue to think the world is going to hell in a hand basket
and use that as an excuse to not be Jesus to the world – immigrants and all!
So, please, put the hand baskets away for now. Our faith
must be in the mission of Jesus, not the mission of the United States.